- The Award Lifecycle
- Assignment of Advance Account
- Charging Maternity or Parental Leave to Sponsored Awards
- Charging Severance to Sponsored Awards
- Consulting or Related Service Agreements Contracted through Harvard
- Cost Sharing Policy
- Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries to Federal Awards
- Capital Equipment Policy
- Gift vs. Sponsored Research Policy
- Guidelines for Federal Sponsored Expenditures
- Interest Income Paid on Non-Federal Sponsored Funds
- International Projects Guidance
- Legal Agreements Workflow, Negotiating Authority and Signing Authority
- NIH Public Access Policy
- On-Campus and Off-Campus IDC Rates
- Participation Agreement
- Policy on Publications
- Principles for IDC to Non-Federal Awards
- Proposal Submission Deadlines
- Provost Criteria
- Retention of Research Data and Materials
- Service Center Policy
- Statement of Policy in Regard to Intellectual Property
- Stipends on Sponsored Awards
- Subrecipient Monitoring
- Summary of Harvard's Research Policies
- Travel Policy
- Tuition Policy
- Effort Reporting Policy
- Establishing an Internal Grant-Making Program
- University Policy and Procedures for Sponsored Financial Reporting
- Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Collaborations: Guidance on Conflict M
- Subrecipient vs. Contractor Guidance
- Resources & Information
- ABOUT US
Criteria and Procedures for Provost's Review of New Projects or Grants
Updated June 2013
The Provost's Office aims to facilitate academic programs, projects and research at Harvard by providing clear criteria and procedures for University-level review of research proposals that pose management challenges and/or reputational risk and by providing reasonable review and oversight of major projects and programs. This process is intended to streamline the review process for PIs and administrators,improve management and administration, and reduce risks for program participants, for individual researchers, for Schools, and for Harvard as an institution. This document describes the criteria that determine whether a proposal requires Provostial review.
Programs and projects that meet these criteria should be reviewed and approved by the Provost's Office before they are proposed to external funders. When unavoidable, proposals relating to international projects may be submitted to external funders prior to Provostial review, as long as they are submitted with the understanding that their status is contingent until they are reviewed and approved by the Provost.
Within the Provost's Office, proposals may be reviewed by the Vice Provost for Research, the University Director for Sponsored Programs, the Vice Provost for International Affairs and, in the case of some international projects, also by the University Committee on International Projects and Sites (UCIPS). In all cases, reviewers will consult with others when relevant.
Once a program or project has received Provostial approval, any significant program expansions or changes should be submitted through this process, so that additional Provostial review may occur.
- The project has an aggregate budget of more than $10 million for U.S.-based projects, or is an international program whose annual budget is greater than:
FAS, HMS $5.0 million HBS $3.8 million HSPH $3.0 million HLS $1.5 million HKS $1.3 million HGSE,HSDM,GSD,HDS,SEAS,RIAS $1.0 million
- The project involves the public use of Harvard University's name and/or trademark. Projects which use the name of a Harvard School or other subsidiary unit of the University do not need Provost’s Review, but do require approval of the School Dean. Further information can be found here, especially question 2.
- The project supports the establishment of any new international site. For this purpose, "new international site" refers to: (1) real estate, including offices and research space, outside the U.S. that is leased for Harvard use for a period of six months or longer; or (2) a project outside the U.S. to which two or more Harvard faculty members, employees, staff members of an affiliated entity, independent contractors, post-doctoral fellows, or students are assigned and placed for a period of six months or longer; or (3) a project that involves significant work in, or the posting of a Harvard faculty member, employee, staff member of an affiliated entity, an independent contractor, post-doctoral fellow, or student to, countries or regions identified as 'High Risk' by Harvard's Global Support Services.
- The project is international and involves human subjects research that requires IRB expedited or full review.
NOTE: If a proposal meets this criterion and no other criterion, it can be reviewed at the time of award rather than at the time of submission.
- The project involves, or is allied with, the direct provision of medical or clinical services.
- A majority of funds in the project (over 50%) will not be expended at Harvard but will be expended through vendors or subcontractors other than Harvard, or a majority of project activities will be conducted by persons who are not Harvard staff.
Exception: Projects in which more than 50% of funds are expended at Harvard-affiliated hospitals (list here, under “HMS affiliates”) do not require provostial review.
- The project has a substantial risk of violating Harvard's anti-discrimination policy.
- The sponsor or project may present a serious reputational risk for the University or may otherwise attract significant adverse publicity to the University.
- The project involves activities for which there is inadequate or uncertain program, financial and/or managerial infrastructure, which may be a special concern in projects that take place outside the United States.
- The project involves a scope, scale, or type of work that is beyond the University's teaching and research mission or is especially unusual or complex.
Proposals should be submitted to Ken Carson (Smith Center 840B), Catherine Breen (Smith Center 635), and Todd Washburn (Smith Center 850A) before the proposal is filed with potential funders, if at all possible, and in all cases before the activity is initiated. A unified email address is being created and will be communicated to you shortly. In order to be reviewed in this process, sufficient detail about the planned activity and its budget should be presented. This does not require an exhaustive narrative and a line-item budget, but the detail should be sufficient to allow the reviewers to understand the purpose and nature of the project, its planned activities, and its budgetary needs. Reviewers may seek more detail, as needed.